Find 3

Occasion 2

In "force B", I wrote:
"These genuine occasions that are dear to us are foreground distractions, that cover his real actions behind it (like a magician); They are excuses to hide actions we would disapprove. "
Test finds these foreground distractions then dispels them by one identifiable marker which is color.

Sadly Test applies to his special day with his partner. Supporting it as proof is blog "3, 4". Most might know Mr. P volunteered a public work that regards Sapphy by the quote, "All the actions of good you were responsible for." If his commitment is to Sapphy (openly shown since about 3 years ago), even when contrarily seen with his partner on his special day, it might not be unthinkable what I'm suggesting or implying may hold some weight.

Occasion 3

Another case is blog "hospital". My belief here is Mr. P personally involved his influence on the news. It misled everyone to believe this reputable medical institution was especially and in the present supporting his illness as true. I disproved it and said this medical institution was not crediting him with their support.

It is an equal circumstance to the blog "valued man" (to quickly respond in couple hours after). The immediate reaction from acts of dishonesty is the worry from being discovered. Thus, the retaliation would be to quickly divert the attention from the evidence.

Proceeded by 1 day the terrible and awful news reached us about the Hamas attack, Mr. P kindly informed us all about it. In consideration we can find he wasn't among the very first to express his sympathy. Anyone could ask, did he catch the wave of sympathy started by others as a way to fast redeem himself away from the uncovered clear actual evidence of deception, he might be responsible for in "hospital"?

By Test, it doesn't fit the natural course of people to change their behavior abruptly from being honest and loving into wrong behavior. A truthful person isn't 2-faced - as Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde.
What followed the mishap of his second post about the same subject (a mistake I could've honestly made myself), in 1 day later had appeared the image of him brightly smiling in a black jacket and wearing my preferred colors I had openly displayed.

(2 short weeks before, I posted the note of "force B" that reaffirmed to Mr. P the precaution about his misuse of color, at when in equal time my suspicion was held (but then unproven) he used steps to acquire color.)

If here you would apply Test, when the image appeared shortly after, it potentially says his second public demonstration of affection may not have been entirely earnest.
I apologize if I seem mean for questioning a possible valid gesture.

If unpleasant, I hope he and anyone will forgive the burden of this blog.
I provided you a method and info. If you choose, please boldly investigate. You are the judge. Thank you.

_________________

-- November 1, 2023, 10am EDT
~Update: Nov 4 | Nov 2